The Great Paranormal Debate

Last night I was a guest on PSI-FI Talk Radio.  The name of the show was titled “The Great Paranormal Debate” with me taking the side of the skeptic.  I was up against clairsentient KD Foreman of California Paranormal Private Investigations (CPPI) and we went through a load of topics all paranormal related.  If anyone is interested in listening you will find the download below.

Direct Download Link (Right Click and Save Target As): http://www.blogtalkradio.com/psi-fi-para-radio/2011/02/17/the-great-paranormal-debate-with-bobby-nelson-and-kd-foreman.mp3?localembed=download

About these ads

About Bobby the Paranormal Skeptic
Bobby Nelson is a skeptic, writer, and co-host of Strange Frequencies Radio. His personal blog can be found online at www.porkrhine.com At one time, Bobby was what could be called a "true believer" in paranormal phenomenon. Having been an active investigator of the paranormal for 12 years with several different Toledo based teams, he has examined countless claims of activity. But years worth of research and investigation proved to him that the evidence for these claims are generally lacking and, furthermore, the vast majority of so-called scientific paranormal investigators were using improper methodologies which caused them to draw both false and misleading conclusions.

5 Responses to The Great Paranormal Debate

  1. Rachel says:

    I finally got to listen to the whole thing.

    1-what is it with her “One size fits all” counter-argument? You listed off at least half a dozen of alternative explanations for EVP, for example. That doesn’t sound like one size fits all, it sounds like a minimum of six sizes to best fit to me ;)

    2-she spends almost an hour talking about how she looks at demons as possible for hauntings, then later she said she’s never come across a demon.

    3-she totally failed when she said you were from New York, and then she fished for more information. Psi-fail.

    4-I feel like you really couldn’t debate her. Because she doesn’t know the definition of half the words she used, and she was talking one completely different methodology than you were (supposition verses science).

    5-she keeps saying that science hasn’t explained everything, but when you counter that she claims science is still wrong.

    These woman are frustratingly gullible that I had to stop listening to the show live about halfway through. Also, I love my trolling ‘magnet’ comment made it to air. I basically was accusing KD of being so gullible that she would think magnets are miracles (that and the whole comment is a trolling meme).

  2. Shadow of a doubt says:

    I noticed, when talking about the flying coffee pot, the other guest said she doesn’t apply the ” one size fits all” method of explaining things, but that’s exactly how paranormalists operate.

  3. We would like to welcome you , your experts, and all your listeners to consider our rational hypothesis for ghost and haunting phenomenon. Frankly, we believe that no current model even comes close! (thatwhichremains.com)

  4. So is love, yet both phenomenon are subjectively and objectively real and can be rationally explained.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: